TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 187, Issue 24

To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 187, Issue 24
From: jack <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:33:13 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree Keith. I want an O3 but it would have to have lots of stuff like the 
new radios to get my interest. I found a lovely K3 with $5000 worth of goodies 
for a song and dance. Just got it working on FSK. 

I spent hours and built and bought interfaces and never could get my O2 to do 
FKS tho it does AFSK with a SignaLink USB fine except that it won’t drive my 
ACOM 1000 to even 500 watts for more than a few moments. Usually settles to 300 
watts and that is it.

Next step is display. Love having 2 full time full power RX. O2 would not keep 
subRX on all the time.

Spent lots of bux trying to get O and O2 to factory specs, unsuccessfully.

Sorry Ten Tec. Love the Orions just want them to work like new.

73 jack ak7o

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: tentec-request@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 10:00 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: TenTec Digest, Vol 187, Issue 24

Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
        tentec@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        tentec-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        tentec-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. When can I buy a new transceiver? (Keith Hanson)
   2. Re: When can I buy a new transceiver? (Byron Cordes)
   3. Wanted to buy:Ten-Tec Model 254 Tuner (Bryan Lee Cornwell)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:12:09 +0000
From: Keith Hanson <ac9s@hotmail.com>
To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] When can I buy a new transceiver?
Message-ID:
        
<BN6PR2001MB10099FDEBED3CCCC909BEDB5872A0@BN6PR2001MB1009.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I purchased an OII at Dayton the first year they came out and couldn't have 
been more happy.  It was fully loaded including the remote pod and served me 
well for many years.  The only thing it appeared to lack was a reasonable 
panadapter / waterfall display which Ten Tec faithfully promised me year after 
year at Dayton and never delivered. I would have been happy with the equivalent 
of my 756Pro display, but it never appeared. However, time marches; I replaced 
the OII in the main position with a Flex 6700 / Maestrocombination several 
years ago and relegated the Orion to back-up duty.

Honestly, with the exception of AGC slope, I find the Flex to be superior in 
every respect.  I have done numerous A/B comparisons and I don't think there 
was ever a time when the Orion receiver would have delivered better than the 
Flex.  The Flex Panafall display, a combination panadapter / waterfall, makes 
pile-ups easy and is wonderful on "dead" bands.  I rarely listen to the "split" 
anymore in a pile-up, I can tell where DX is listening by spreading the pile-up 
across the entire screen and seeing calling stations.  Plus the ability to look 
at all the bands simultaneously during a contest changes that part of the 
equation.

Bottom line for me now is that although I have lobbied for on OIII for years I 
don't think I would buy one if it were offered - unless somehow it were to beat 
Flex SmartSDR at its game.  That is doubtful, but I'll keep an open mind.

Keith - AC9S


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 08:05:58 -0500
From: Byron Cordes <byroncordes@icloud.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] When can I buy a new transceiver?
Message-ID: <F8126D77-4A77-4158-9814-502275D7A35F@icloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Yes the Orion doesn?t have all the bells it does have the whistle! I do like 
the way it handles 160  . Turn down gain 1/2 or so and signals weak and strong 
sound great.
 Yes the Orion is showing it?s age! But it was the best radio out there for 
years! Maybe there are better radios now but not many and none for the price of 
a used Orion
  Myself I use 4 different radios each has there high and low ?s  .  I think 
radios are a lot like antennas , one can never have to many ! 
  What will be interesting is seeing where the radio manufacturers go from here 
. Icom has changed the game with the 7300 (sold thousands!) a good radio that 
does a lot of things good . What will Yaesu Kenwood and the others bring out? 
There?s a small market for $6000 radios( Flex Elecraft and the other flag 
ships) or will the manufacturers slowly have sales go down (because of brand 
loyalty ) 
 There might be fewer manufacturers in 5 years , there will thousands of used 
7300 where those owner might want to up grade. There are just a few new Ham 
getting in to this sport and a lot of us are old. So probably less Radio sales 
,less money , less manufacturers to build less radio .     Maybe I better get 
another Orion !
Byron AC9PA 

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 27, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Keith Hanson <ac9s@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I purchased an OII at Dayton the first year they came out and couldn't have 
> been more happy.  It was fully loaded including the remote pod and served me 
> well for many years.  The only thing it appeared to lack was a reasonable 
> panadapter / waterfall display which Ten Tec faithfully promised me year 
> after year at Dayton and never delivered. I would have been happy with the 
> equivalent of my 756Pro display, but it never appeared. However, time 
> marches; I replaced the OII in the main position with a Flex 6700 / 
> Maestrocombination several years ago and relegated the Orion to back-up duty.
> 
> Honestly, with the exception of AGC slope, I find the Flex to be superior in 
> every respect.  I have done numerous A/B comparisons and I don't think there 
> was ever a time when the Orion receiver would have delivered better than the 
> Flex.  The Flex Panafall display, a combination panadapter / waterfall, makes 
> pile-ups easy and is wonderful on "dead" bands.  I rarely listen to the 
> "split" anymore in a pile-up, I can tell where DX is listening by spreading 
> the pile-up across the entire screen and seeing calling stations.  Plus the 
> ability to look at all the bands simultaneously during a contest changes that 
> part of the equation.
> 
> Bottom line for me now is that although I have lobbied for on OIII for years 
> I don't think I would buy one if it were offered - unless somehow it were to 
> beat Flex SmartSDR at its game.  That is doubtful, but I'll keep an open mind.
> 
> Keith - AC9S
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:45:53 -0400
From: Bryan Lee Cornwell <blcornwell@k2blc.com>
To: Ten-Tec mailing list <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Wanted to buy:Ten-Tec Model 254 Tuner
Message-ID: <4d4821e3-b1e4-b62c-386c-53cd66af7c80@k2blc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Wanted to buy:

Ten-Tec Model 254 Tuner

http://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=254

Please reply to :

blcornwell@k2blc.com

Thanks

Lee K2BLC



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


------------------------------

End of TenTec Digest, Vol 187, Issue 24
***************************************

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 187, Issue 24, jack <=