TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Plus at Hamvention!

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Plus at Hamvention!
From: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 00:02:51 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Look forward to seeing it. 3K is not expensive for a world class rig in
2019 that's made in America...

On Fri, May 31, 2019, 3:13 PM Byron Cordes via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
wrote:

> Hello
> Glad Ten Tec is back with radios . Would be nice to see things take off
> for them. I still think a antenna tuner or lower cost items would sell .
> Like the Alpha wattmeters maybe low power tuners .
>  I know websites cost money but even the little guys selling repair parts
> for old radios and amps have way better websites. At least I can order
> parts !
>  Anyway this is a start .
>   Good luck and wishes ! Mike
> 73s Byron  AC9PA
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On May 31, 2019, at 4:47 PM, k0wtz--- via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I say give his radio a chance if it preforms like the tentecs I have
> good for him. I work cw my tentecs all work flawlessly nothing touches
> tentec for cw and actually phone if you do some work with them and learn
> them.
> >
> > I have had the best Kenwood makes and went back to tentec no comparision!
> >
> > good luck to you
> >
> > bob k0wtz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > all things are possible in Christ Jesus our savior     On Friday, May
> 31, 2019, 4:22:53 PM CDT, Ken Pearce <n4kcd@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hadn’t really wanted to reply to this. But I was there and saw the
> radio.
> >
> > I don’t agree that the price is to high as I saw plenty of people
> willing to pay upwards of 6000.00 for the new Elecraft, Flex, or Icom
> radios.
> >
> > Outside of Elecraft or Flex the Omni will likely have no competition in
> the receiver category. TenTec has a big following from their government and
> commercial customers
> > Because of the quality.
> >
> > 73,
> > Ken
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On May 31, 2019, at 16:02, <Rick@dj0ip.de> <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> As an experienced businessman, for me his comments came across as
> someone who is trying to build a business on a solid foundation, rather
> than on a house of cards.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I applaud Mike for setting a goal, working hard at it, and apparently
> having now achieved it.
> >>
> >> I must admit I feared he would fail, but he has achieved his goal of
> bringing an improved radio to market.  Well done mike!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He has taken 3 or 4 of the old products and added useful value to them.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately it is not possible to compete with the JA prices, so his
> new products will remain pie in the sky for those lucky enough to be able
> to afford it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I hope there are still enough old die-hard Ten-Tec users around to
> reward Mike for his effort.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Good luck Mike!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Rick, DJ0IP
> >>
> >> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
> >>
> >> May the Sunspots be with us!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: TenTec <tentec-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Bernie Skoch
> via TenTec
> >> Sent: 31 May 2019 19:39
> >> To: tentec@contesting.com
> >> Cc: Bernie Skoch <k5xs@aol.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Plus at Hamvention!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>