To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues |
From: | sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland) |
Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:03:03 +0100 |
Hi Frank, I worked 150 countries on 1.8MHz using a bent dipole at 45' high - made out of a 3.5MHz flat-top dipole, with 66' of wire soldered onto each end and sloped/drooped semi-vertically down to two 8' poles. Used to call it an inverted-U, which was a rather grand name for it. It is the centre 132' of the antenna that is going to do most of the radiating - what happens to the rest of the antenna ain't that important. An inverted-U shape is better than inverted vee to my mind because the average height of the antenna is better. Vy 73 Steve, VK6VZ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Lightning Protection, KN4LF, Thomas Giella |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: skew path example, Dan Robbins |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues, Ivo PEZER, 5B4ADA |
Next by Thread: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues, Joe Reisert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |