| To: | <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: (no subject) | 
| From: | SteamBoilers@aol.com (SteamBoilers@aol.com) | 
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:23:34 EST | 
Hello Gents For 160 is a quarter wave insulated vertical better than a quarter wave shunt fed tower over the same amount of radials. (insulating the tower is more problematic ) but will work at whats best. Thanks in advance Many thanks to Greg ZL3IX for calculations about raising the tower. Regards Alan G3ZES.  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: 5R8FU last night, n4uk@mindspring.com | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Re: Noise and reception, by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: 5R8FU last night, n4uk@mindspring.com | 
| Next by Thread: | Topband: (no subject), <kd9sv@home.com (gary nichols) | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |