To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: ET3PMW and 7X0DX |
From: | garry@ni6t.com (Garry Shapiro) |
Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 03:44:58 -0000 |
Bob: Excuse me, but IMHO your Point 1 should be modified as follows: 1. being QRV from a QTH from which there is propagation to the DX. Garry > > So, my maybe not so striking observation is that in order of importance to > achiving success on the band: 1. being QRV. 2. RX capability. 3. Output > power. Don't get me wrong, a KW never hurts especially under marginal > conditions but, let's not discourage potential low band OPS from > working 160 > meters even with small antennas and 100 watts. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Anyone Using a Titanex SES-160 ?, Larry Burke WI5A |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: ET3PMW Update, Bill Tippett |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: ET3PMW and 7X0DX, <rgarrett@sunlink.net (Bob Garrett) |
Next by Thread: | Topband: ET3PMW and 7X0DX, JOHN DOBSON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |