John don't you think that it was the 4 elevated radials that did most of the
coupling in that case or do you think it would be just as bad using ground
radials? Clive GM3POI
----- Original Message -----
From: "john devoldere, ON4UN" <john.devoldere@pandora.be>
To: "w7dd" <w7dd@msn.com>; <Topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: Coupling between bev and other antennas
> The directional pattern shown in fig 7-28 of LOW BAND DX-ing, ed 3, was
> modeled with EZNEC ! You can see a very substabntial amount of coupling
and
> an almost useless radiation pattern resulted, which was the case in actual
> practice.
>
> John, ON4UN
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "w7dd" <w7dd@msn.com>
> To: <Topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:34 AM
> Subject: Topband: Coupling between bev and other antennas
>
>
> > Using Eznec I have modeled a beverage and a 1/4 wave vertical in very
> close
> > proximity and in many locations around the beverage. Eznec thinks there
> is
> > no coupling. I was surprised by this but I tend to have faith in Eznec.
> >
> > Don
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Topband mailing list
> > Topband@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|