Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Re: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas (Barry, W9UCW)

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Re: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas (Barry, W9UCW)
From: doconnor at chartermi.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Sat May 17 08:56:51 2003
Barry,
Given your premise that the observed current taper equals radiation, and 
assuming that 1500 watts into the average antenna coil neither melts it, nor 
radiates light, then it must be radiated as baseband... Correct?

So, as part of your article I would expect (if I were a referee reviewing your 
paper) that you would also remove the vertical radiator portions above and 
below the coil, replace them with a parallel capacitor across the coil and 
measure the current taper and the radiated field strength... If your premise is 
that the EM field contained in an inductor is not as conserved as previously 
thought, then a parallel tuned circuit, minus the radiating whip, should result 
in radiation consistent with the observed current taper minus heating losses... 
 Correct?

The other item I would consider essential, as a referee, would be the placement 
of the tuned coil into a calorimeter bomb, and a measurement of the developed 
heat, so that we can quantify how much radiation is baseband, and how much is 
IR loss..  
Assuming I understand what has been said...

Be aware that a published article/book challenging what is considered to be 
established physics. is tantamount to a double dare...  Expect to be thumped 
roundly about the head and shoulders by critics...


Cheers  ...  Denny
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>