Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160 Beacons

To: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>,"Tod - Idaho" <tod@skypoint.com>, "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160 Beacons
From: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:19:04 +0200
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
And why not having a cluster who collects data from fixed beacon receivers.
So we have a complete overview of propagation conditions continually in
chart, at any time all over the world ...........

jos on4kj

ps: Jos is not actif (yet ) on topband because of not ebnough space for
antenna.
Can't persue myself to charge the 65 foot tower at  20 foot from the chack.
affraid for RF return in the schack, at this short distance .


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
To: "Tod - Idaho" <tod@skypoint.com>; "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: 160 Beacons


>   What if the ON/OFF function of each beacon were controllable over the
> internet by beacon operation society members around the world with
> passwords. As long as one member was logged into the system, would it
> then be "attended"?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
>


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>