To: | Topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Col-atch-co 160/80 meter antenna |
From: | Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:48:01 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
"Dave Anderson, K4SV" wrote: > I am interested to know if the top loaded vs bottom loading type of antenna > is prefered. Didn't try the Col-atch-co antenna, but speaking generally, top coil (plus loading wires) gives better current distribution in the antenna, resulting in higher radiation resistance, lower losses and higher bandwidth. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Col-atch-co 160/80 meter antenna, Dave Anderson, K4SV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Beverage Noise pickup, Greg Chartrand |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Col-atch-co 160/80 meter antenna, Dave Anderson, K4SV |
Next by Thread: | Re:Topband: Col-atch-co 160/80 meter antenna, i4jmy@iol.it |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |