To: | "Roger D Johnson" <n1rj@adelphia.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: vertical 160/80m |
From: | "Ryszard Tymkiewicz" <rtym@ippt.gov.pl> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:41:55 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
: I have used several versions of this antenna over the years. The : last being the Titanex V-160s. Roger,thanks for e-mail. Well,I suspect you have used 90 ft vertical WITHOUT a hat /?/. I would like to use a hat to minimize losses on 160m and I want to have 100 ft high mast. There is another question ..Is it worth to build 100ft high vertical instead of 90ft which I'v noticed most are using? 73 Rys SP5EWY _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Re: 1837.5 KC/1845 KC CW QRM, Roger D Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: vertical 160/80m, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: vertical 160/80m, Roger D Johnson |
Next by Thread: | Topband: (no subject), Dxhogg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |