Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: full wave loop

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: full wave loop
From: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:15:09 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
At 07:53 AM 2005-03-03, Earl W Cunningham wrote:
>A full wave loop (which I prefer to call a "quad loop"), will radiate
>straight up if it is mounted in a horizontal plane, even if it is 500
>feet above ground!!  It might be useful for short skip (straight up,
>straight down) propagation, but any low-angle signal for DX use would be
>virtually non-existent.

At 02:57 AM 2005-03-03, Tom Rauch wrote:
>The loop tends to NULL the signal along the
>horizon, but the earth itself already nulls the horizontally
>polarized wave along the horizon.

Not to defend the horizontal loop as a great antenna, but there isn't much 
of a tendency to null on the horizon compared to a dipole at the same 
height.  Mounted at 1 wavelength high, the signal at a 14 degree takeoff 
angle is only down about 2 dB from a dipole along the line perpendicular to 
the feedpoint while it's actually about 2 dB higher in the minima off the 
"sides" compared to the signal off the end of a dipole.

The signal straight up is only about 2 dB higher, too.  Yep, it's darn 
close to a "feel good" dipole.

When I lived in the frozen north, near Seattle, one value of the loop was 
apparent:  you can connect it to a high current DC power supply and melt 
off the ice buildup that threatened my 26 gauge stealth loop!  It was later 
replaced by a G5RV and nobody knew but me, my antenna tuner, and the ice.

Keep clam,
Terry

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>