Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Tuning elevated radials

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Tuning elevated radials
From: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:35:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I'm working on building an elevated radial vertical.  After installing the 
radials, I have a question about what I'm finding.

Using a small toroid that I split in two, I wound 9 turns on each half, glued 
the halves to the inside of a plastic clothes pin, and installed a full wave 
bridge using 1N914s and a 0.01uF cap.  The small clip attached to an elevated 
radial provides a relative voltage indication, which provides a current sense.  
With 100W into the antenna, a reading of 4vdc to 25vdc is obtained from an 
individual radial.  The readings a quite repeatable using a digital VOM.

There are three elevated radials, each about 1/4wL and each about 120 degrees 
apart.  At resonance, I find that the current was not well balanced between the 
radials.  So I started trimming.  It turns out that by trimming the highest 
current radial, the system came into relative balance.

By trimming the excess length off a couple of radials, I found that I could 
balance the relative current reading pretty good.  At resonance, this is what I 
obtained.

                      trimmed         pre-trim
North radial = 10.0 vdc       21.8 vdc
SW radial =    11.0 vdc       10.5 vdc
SE radial =      10.5 vdc        5.6 vdc

Here is what surprised me.  

A 1.4% change (up) in frequency moved the trimmed values to:

North radial = 12.7 vdc
SW radial =    11.3 vdc
SE radial =       8.0 vdc

A 4.2% change (up) in frequency moved the trimmed values to:

North radial = 17.2 vdc
SW radial =      6.2 vdc
SE radial =       4.5 vdc

Now admittedly, this is somewhat kludge in that the 706 I was using to drive 
the antenna was shutting down due to a bad load, but it is the relative reading 
that I believe to be important.  I was expecting to see the values remain 
somewhat constant over frequency after trimming.  Instead, I find a nearly 4:1 
difference between them.

The goal of the process was to minimize pattern skew.  I'm thinking it might be 
quieter if I achieve a good null at zenith.  Perhaps this is a twisted notion 
to begin with.  I find that the position of the radials is very important.  The 
SE radial needs to snake its way through some bushes and repositioning that 
radial has a significant impact (negative) on the current carried by that 
radial.

Is this normal for an elevated vertical?  I know I am splitting hairs on this, 
but I'm trying to understand better what is happening.  Modeling using NEC2 
does not seem to predict these behaviors.

Any empirical evidence from others who have experimented with this would be 
appreciated.

73

Ford-N0FP
ford@cmgate.com


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>