| To: | "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>, <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: New rules? (Was CQ 160 WW) | 
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> | 
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:33:48 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
At 08:06 PM 1/31/06, Ford Peterson wrote:
>Wow!  I guess you think the band should really get carved up for a contest
         Not at all Ford, but just don't complain if
someone works DX you can't hear on "your" frequency.
It's not their fault if you can't hear it.  If you
choose to land yourself where DX also happens to be,
then others have just as much right to answer it
as you do to CQ on top of it.  That's just the way
contests are.  Life is cruel isn't it?  :-)
                                         73,  Bill  W4ZV
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: New rules? (Was CQ 160 WW), Ford Peterson | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: New rules? (Was CQ 160 WW), bob finger | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: New rules? (Was CQ 160 WW), Ford Peterson | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: New rules? (Was CQ 160 WW), bob finger | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |