To: | Rune Øye <la7tha@tussa.com>,<topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Top loaded antenna and Radials. |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:13:28 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> I remember reading somewhere that if you have a top loaded > antenna, it is not "necessary" to install > radials that is longer than the vertical part of the > antenna. > You don't win much on the efficiency when you make them > longer than the vertical part of antenna. > Is this true????. No. It is definitely not true at all. It is an old myth. In nearly all cases the short vertical actually requires longer radials and more of them to have maximum efficiency. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Modeling verticals (fat, skinny, etc) on EZNEC, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Measuring field strength, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Top loaded antenna and Radials., Rune Øye |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Modeling verticals (fat, skinny, etc) on EZNEC, Rick Karlquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |