Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Sherwood data

To: jkearman@att.net, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Sherwood data
From: Bill Barrett - W2PKY <w2pky@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:09:56 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I have found, on the MK V, using IPO and the Ant Attenuator can help 
readability of weak signals by reducing the AGC action. My settings of these 
controls minimizes signal input as much as possible to gain better apparent 
signal to noise ratio.
73;
Bill W2PKY


----- Original Message ----
From: James Kearman <jkearman@att.net>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:50:56 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: Sherwood data


Tom Rauch wrote:
> 4.) AGC can affect readability of weak signals near noise. 
> Humans do NOT want a perfect AGC when copying weak signals 
> near noise. They do not want a perfect AGC in pileups 
> either. Designing a receiver with no volume change for 
> signal level change is a mistake for HF DXing or contesting 
> use.
I will raise my glass to this one in particular. "Good" AGC bypasses the 
best signal processor we have -- our brains -- which can use slight 
differences in signal amplitude to separate signals. If I ever build my 
dream receiver the AGC is going to get a lot of attention.

73,

Jim, KR1S
http://kf1s.kearman.com/


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>