To: | "Kevin Schavee" <n0cwrham@gmail.com>, "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: comparison |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:37:40 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:57:12 -0600, Kevin Schavee wrote: >Has any one modeled the difference between Inverted L and full size >1/4 wave 160m antennas? The biggest difference you can make is with radials. The shorter your antenna, the more important it is to have more radials. They don't need to be long, they don't need to be uniform, they just need to be there. More is better, longer is better, more is more important than longer. :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: comparison, Kevin Schavee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: comparison, Herb Schoenbohm |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: comparison, Kevin Schavee |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: comparison, Herb Schoenbohm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |