Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: "T" Antenna VS 30m high vertical

To: "ik0yvv\@libero\.it" <ik0yvv@libero.it>,"topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: "T" Antenna VS 30m high vertical
From: GEORGE WALLNER <gwallner@the-beach.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:10:14 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>


On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:38:48 +0200
  "ik0yvv\@libero\.it" <ik0yvv@libero.it> wrote:
> Now i'm using an 18m vertical with 2 slope wires (each 
>10m long and with an angle of about 45° ...i tune this 
>antenna on 160 with a coil (about 21uH 20cmx20cm) and on 
>80m with a vacuum capacitor .... 
> I was thinking to take down this antenna and putting a 
>30m high vertical without the 2 capacitive wires .... 
>those 2 wires gave me in the past several meccanical 
>problems ... eznec it seems that the antenna i'm 
>using now has a better efficency 

Marco,

I was facing the same problem: had to get rid of my top 
wires for mechanical reasons. First I tried a 31 meter 
tall vertical fed via a 20 uH inductor. It worked but not 
as well as what I had before. Then I moved the inductor up 
to the 13 m point (about 40 uH) and since then I feel (and 
EZNEC indicates) that I have a better antenna. I believe 
that the numerous EU QRP QSO-s confirm that belief.

GL,

George
AA7JV
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>