Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: RST original meanings ...

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: RST original meanings ...
From: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Reply-to: Steve Flood <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:48:49 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The original RST scale seems needlessly overdetailed.  Each R,S and T could 
be reduced to perhaps 3 subjective qualifiers with fewer ambiguous 
adjectives/adverbs.

Readability
1 - Barely readable
2 - Readable with some difficulty
3 - Perfectly readable

Signal Strength
1 - Weak
2 - Moderate
3 - Strong

Tone
1- Bad tone - harsh buzz/chirp/etc present.
2 - Some buzz/chirp/etc detectable.
3 - Good tone

Steve, KK7UV

_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>