To: | "160 reflector" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Ground radials |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:29:32 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:02:17 -0800 (PST), N7DF wrote: >placing elevated radials above surface or buried radials is a good idea Please define elevated in terms of a wavelength and a feedpoint at ground level. I'm not trying to be a smarta$$, I'm trying to learn from your work, of which I appreciate the difficulty. :) Another question. Did any of your work in this regard include field strength measurements? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Sometimes the Topband Deities are Generous, Brian Moran |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: TX3A this morning, Tom McAlee |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Ground radials, N7DF |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Ground radials, DAVID CUTHBERT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |