Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160M inverted L, 1/4 wave vs 3/8 wave?

To: <n4rp@aiko.com>, "TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160M inverted L, 1/4 wave vs 3/8 wave?
From: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:25:45 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On Wednesday 11th November, Ross wrote:

"...I'd like some input on whether the 3/8 wave inverted L or 1/4 wave
inverted L is likely to be a better low takeoff angle antenna."

**********************************

Ross,

>From what I understand there are advantages & trade-offs unique to both
types...

The one HUGE advantage that I especially like with my three 170' "L's" here
is the fact that I do not have to trim / lengthen the radiating portions to
achieve resonance on any selected frequency at the start of the operating
season: I let the 300-pfd. variable capacitors at the base of each do that
job for me.

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ


_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>