To: | K9AY <k9ay@k9ay.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: verticals and radials and such |
From: | DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:13:24 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
NCJ radial article: The NCJ article included far-field losses and that is what made the verticals seem rather inefficient with even a fine ground system. Previous articles and research have focused on near-field losses and comparisons between 120 quarter wavelength radials and some smaller number of radials. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast #2009-39, Thomas F. Giella NZ4O |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: QSL help for TT8JFC from February 1998, k8gg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: verticals and radials and such, K9AY |
Next by Thread: | Topband: EUROS, Craig Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |