Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 84, Issue 25

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 84, Issue 25
From: "Howard W3CQH" <hsgorden@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:34:25 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Questions:

Of either a 12' or 33' or 43' VERTICALS - which one is best?

Who is the MFG??

73
Howard
W3CQH
==========================================
 > Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (Sam Morgan)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:24:54 -0600
> From: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days
> To: paulkb8n@aol.com
> Cc: topband@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <4B26C946.3040400@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> paulkb8n@aol.com wrote:
>> The guy who has the record this year, I believe, is Jim, W5JAW, in five
>> hours!  Incredibly, Jim did this with Low Power to a 12 FOOT VERTICAL 
>> !!!
>> Can anyone top that?!
>>
> that's pretty amazing 'low power' usually means 150w doesn't it?
>
> and if my 13 foot tall 160m antenna is comparable,
> that would mean about 1.5% or so efficiency,
> so, I'm guessing 150 x 0.015 = 2.25w ERP
>
> can Jim or anyone confirm that?
>
> -- 
> GB & 73
> K5OAI
> Sam Morgan
>
>
> ------------------------------

_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>