Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Effect of current max not at base of vertical.

To: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>, "TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Effect of current max not at base of vertical.
From: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:10:54 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
-----Original Message----- 
From: Guy Olinger K2AV
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 9:03 AM
To: TopBand List
Subject: Topband: Effect of current max not at base of vertical.

This is an answer to an off reflector conversation, relating to a "too long"
electrical length over radials reducing performance.  I am writing to the
list since the subject and it's objection occur in so many posted
conversations.  Reduction of gain by too high current max has been touted by
some and called myth by others.

------------------------------------------------------------------

OK Guy,

Please explain in a comparative sense to the examples presented in your 
post, the 1/2 wavelength verticals (vertical dipoles) used at WWV where the 
maximum current is raised to near 3/8 WL AGL.

Inquiring minds would like to know why WWV would utilize this configuration 
of vertically polarized antenna vs the "Gold Standard" 1/4 WL you describe. 
It would seem the illumination of the ground from the center fed 1/2 WL 
vertical dipole would present an extreme example of additional ground 
losses.  Yet we all know from experience that the WWV radiation performance 
is excellent.

Thanks for your time in making this requested comparison and presenting your 
view.

Milt, N5IA

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>