| To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, etc.... | 
| From: | n0ah.ham Paul Veal <bryonveal@msn.com> | 
| Date: | Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:08:14 -0700 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
| 
I think I speak for many when the real issue is adjacent digital QRM at or near 
the edge of 1.835MHz.  There is much less CW from 1.840MHz-1.850Mhz. If antenna 
tuning issues are the main problem, why not just move up outside the band edge 
of 1.840Mhz??  
 
I have a real problem with digital operators who ignore our presence near or 
around 1.838MHz and just blindly transmit where stations are listening.  I 
really appreciate the nature of a lot of the informative posts from JT65 
operators on this matter, but are we just not discussing moving up 3 KHz from 
1.838Mhz?     
 
73      
paul  N0AH
DM79nn
                                          
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: More Inv-L matching issues.... BIGGER ISSUE, Paul Dulaff | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 meters, Andy Blank | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, Steven Raas | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF, etc...., Joe Subich, W4TV | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |