Sure glad I found this TB reflector with the scoop on everything
from antennas to protocol.
I would be lost without the sage advice of my big (signal)
brothers.
.
73
jim / W1FMR
--- On Wed, 1/25/12, Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca> wrote:
From: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB
To: "Jim Hoge" <knowkode@verizon.net>, "topband reflector"
<topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2012, 1:39 PM
If you hear a DX station working people , and cant hear the
callers ... well I suggest you tune around until you find the
pileup... easy !
Using 1812 allowed him to work NA and JA
No matter what some people just never clue in ...
Glenn VA3DX
Subject: Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB
Jim,
I disagree with your final comment. The sender is always responsible for
insuring he won't cause interference to ongoing communications when he comes
on frequency. Yes, the directions from HK0NA were unclear but I would
venture he was listening for JAs as their bandplan limits their operations
considerably but it's no excuse for muddied directions.
73,
Jim W5QM
Subject: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB
I listened to HK0NA this morning around 1.8328 and he was sending "12" after
his CQ.
and folks were madly calling 12 Khz up, and 12 Khz down from his frequency.
Also lots of callers were calling around 1.812.
All I have is RIT on the 5w. Elecraft K1 and couldn't work him even if I had
dual VFOs anyway
but I still don't know what that "12" meant, but there sure was ample
opportunity for unintentional QRM to occur to other stations and not be
entirely the fault of the sender.
73,
jim / W1FMR
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|