Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 07:07:11 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
James Rodenkirch wrote:
>What about radials above the ground?

This link http://www.commtechrf.com/documents/nab1995.pdf leads to a paper 
by Clarence Beverage with some real-world results for monopoles with 
elevated wires used as a counterpoise.   Here is a quote from it:


 \ \The antenna system consisted of a lightweight, 15 inch face tower, 120 
feet in height, with a base insulator at the 15 foot elevation and six 
elevated radials, a quarter wave in length, spaced evenly around the tower 
and elevated 15 feet above the ground. The radials were fully insulated from 
ground and supported at the ends by wooden tripods.

Power was fed to the system through a 200 foot length of coaxial cable with 
the cable shield connected to the shunt element of the T network and to the 
elevated radials. A balun or RF choke on the feedline was not employed and 
the feedline was isolated from the lower section of the tower. The system 
operated on 1580 kHz at a power of 750 watts.

The efficiency of the antenna was determined by radial field intensity 
measurements along 12 radials extending out to a distance of up to 85 
kilometers. The measured RMS efficiency was 287 mV/m for 1 kW, at one 
kilometer, which is the same measured value as would be expected for a 0.17 
wave tower above 120 buried radials. / /


So while such "elevated" installations are rare for AM broadcast stations, 
their performance has been measured to be about the same as when using an 
r-f ground consisting of 120 buried wires, each 1/4-wave long (free space 
length).

These elevated systems are readily modeled using NEC-2.  However the 
radiation patterns shown by a typical NEC far-field analysis do not 
accurately show the fields actually "launched" by them, or by any vertical 
radiator with its base near the earth, because they do not include the 
surface wave.

The fields radiated in and near the horizontal plane by any vertical 
monopole of 5/8 wavelength height and less are the greatest fields it 
radiates in the entire elevation plane, regardless of earth conductivity. 
Those fields from very low elevation angles (say, less then 5 degrees) can 
reach the ionosphere, and under the right conditions return to the earth as 
a useful skywave.

The link below illustrates this concept.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/Space_Surface_Wave_Compare.gif


_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>