Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity

To: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>, "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:12:05 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
If we knew those, then we could calculate the location and distance of the
signal hops. That might give us some insight as to why some people have
found a taller monopole to be worse than a shorter one at a given distance.

Back in the 70's or 80's there was speculation a low angle was lossy from grazing along, based on others having poor experiences with taller verticals. The top of my tall tower had some antennas and side arms which top loaded it a bit, but not much. Certainly the wave refracts gradually at a minimum, and so I think distance would not tell anyone much. There have been a host of theories since the 1960's, even some from Stew the real W1BB. :-)

I don't know what happens when it gets up in the soup, although people like K9LA should be pretty well versed on it. I only know things behave differently all the time, and what antenna generally works most of the time.

For example, at sunrise most of the time almost anything reasonably efficient works about the same here. It's more a matter of ERP at any not-too-low angle and any polarization.

73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>