Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: dipole height

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: dipole height
From: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:38:23 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
James Wolf wrote:
In general, this is the case, but it is not always true.  Consider that you
can have an antenna with a high RDF number, but at the same time has a
pattern where rear lobe positions favor the optimum elevation angles for
arriving propagated atmospheric noise.  If you look at some of the various
Low Band receive antennas and vary their parameters around, you can end up
with high RDF number with significant lobes off the back that are only 10 dB
down from the main signal.  The pattern is always a compromise and a good
RDF number is a great tool to have in the box, but it is not the only
consideration.
Jim, KR9U


That's very true. Consider the K9AY. The RDF is about 7.7. Compare that to a 1 wavelength Beverage which is about 7.9 dB. The K9AY has a deep null in the 180 degree direction at the right elevation angle, but 45 degrees off that rear direction the signal is down only 10 dB. The RDF number is a W8JI creation and serves its purpose, while the DMF is an ON4UN creation and also has merit, but neither of these completely encompasses all the things you may need to know about a receiving antenna for your location. You have to use some common sense in junction with these numbers.

Jerry, K4SAV


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>