To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is notgoingtodieqiuite yet.................... |
From: | "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:05:11 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Fortunately it is true since I stipulated qualified people as in plural. That is not true. Accuracy is not determined by a vote or opinion poll.I can give dozens of examples, but one that comes to mind is use of a balun on the input of an unbalanced network tuner. That was popularly accepted when initiated, is still argued today as a good idea by respected members of the ARRL staff and others, but is easily proven a bad idea with analysis and/or measurements. Popularity or mass agreement is not an indicator of accuracy. Only measurement and accurate analysis ensures accuracy. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not goingtodieqiuite yet...................., Tom W8JI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Help With 80M Array, Wayne Willenberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not goingtodieqiuite yet...................., Tom W8JI |
Next by Thread: | Topband: weird propagation, k9la@frontier.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |