Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: trimming elevated radials

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: trimming elevated radials
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:45:17 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
What is the preferred method of tuning elevated radials for uniformity?


Jeff and all,

It takes two halves of a system to make a whole system. This means the vertical affects the radial resonant length, just as the radial length would affect the resonance of the vertical when they are in a system.

Looking for nulls and peaks doesn't work, because voltage or current changes so slowly.

What works for a first approximation is tuning the radials like dipoles, using opposing radials. Then, after the initial four or more radials are tuned like dipoles with ach half equal length, look at ONE radial at a time against all of the remaining radials tied together as a counterpoise. This keeps the vertical, which is probably not resonant yet, out of the picture. This sorts out any radials that are resonant "length flyers".

This is the procedure I always followed.

If the radials are resonant, and if you have enough of them, radial-to-earth voltage will be a minimum at the feedpoint and bandwidth will be a maximum. Bandwidth will generally get wider with more radials because radial system sharpness will decrease, even as loss decreases. The more radials you use, the less critical resonance and earth isolation becomes.

After the radials are tuned and verified, the vertical can be tuned or matched.

Or you can just cut them all to one length, and without a known reference system you would have no idea if it didn't work as well as possible. If you get a few good reports, or work a new country, it would prove a 20 dB increase. :-)

73 Tom
All good topband ops know fine whiskey is a daylight beverage.
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>