Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Well, Duh... (Apology re: ARRL160)

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Well, Duh... (Apology re: ARRL160)
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:07:38 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
This entire discussion strikes me as comical. I can recall several quite extensive discussions about the DX Window, and most of them have come to a consensus that that the DX window on topband was dead and buried. I haven't bothered to check the archives, but if I did, I'll bet that I've find that at least some of those speaking out so strongly in favor it it now said exactly the opposite back then.

Another comical point -- everything written at HQ seems to be handed down from on high as chiseled into stone. How else to explain a rule for this contest that flies in the face of the CAC's recommendations from four years ago? Or does it mean that nothing that members say matters, and that nothing can ever change.

73, Jim K9YC

On 12/13/2013 4:52 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
[1] Actually June, 2009, yes they did vote to drop it, and it was the ARRL
Contest Advisory Committee. See:


http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee%20Reports/July/29_Contest_Advisory_Committee.pdf

An interesting read.

Should note that the report phrases the current rule as a "recommendation",
as if to indicate they don't consider it a hard rule, and*nobody*  voted to
make it a "requirement". They consider the rule unenforceable. From the
report:

"4. Vote: Rule 6.1
  A. Delete (9)
  B. Make it a requirement (0)
  C. Leave it as a recommendation (7)"

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>