| To: | topband reflector <Topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: oil-submerged variables |
| From: | Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:44:04 -0500 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Thanks, everyone. I had not thought about the possible difference
between 600M and 160 in terms of heating. Jon's suggestion of using big
old micas sure seems like a good one if I can find what I need. As a
refugee from the BC-610 era I'm amazed that any are still around!
-- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com. For spots, please go to your favorite ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substitute forvacuum variables, Tom W8JI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Short receiving verticals question, Doug Renwick |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Short receiving verticals question, Jon Zaimes AA1K |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: oil-submerged variables, Gary Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |