Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials

[Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>]

w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html

Check the links on that page to N6LF, Rudy Severns' pages. His work has
been called the gold standard of radial science.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net> wrote:

> I understand that 120 radials is the golden standard.  At what point is
> there no significant improvement?
>
> How much worse is 60 radials?  How much worse is 24 radials (4 of 1/4
> lambda and 20 or 1/10 lambda)?
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband