Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes

To: "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:12:32 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
What the hell is the need for wideband data in the amateur radio bands? Is
it just a ploy to  usurp the amateur bands for commercial purposes? And
there's a heck of a lot more band width available at VHF and UHF!  Why
wideband at HF?? Makes no sense to me! 

??
Charlie, K4OTV

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Subich, W4TV
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:38 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital
Modes


I'm sure there are some military/commercial systems that will do it
but I don't believe that even the Flex are clean enough to handle
the really wide band commercial data modulations.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/4/2014 11:30 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
> FWIW, I believe such transceivers do exist. Don't the Flex SDRs have that
> capability?
>
>   ... as if there are any amateur transceivers capable of operating with
>> data bandwidth greater than 2.8 KHz.
>>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>