Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter
From: Jose Orellana - EA7BJ <ea7bj@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 21:42:58 +0100
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I use this
http://f6aoj.ao-journal.com/crbst_136.html


> From: km1h@jeremy.mv.com
> To: kajotus@gmail.com; topband@contesting.com
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:54:44 -0400
> Subject: Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter
> 
> Im in the wrong business!
> 
> Carl
> KM1H
> 
> 
> 
> > Have a look on ebay - rx splitter .
> >
> > http://www.ebay.com/itm/ANTENNA-SPLITTER-COMBINER-RX-HF-1-50-MHz-SO-239-conn
> > ectors-/321217220222?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Antennas&hash=item4aca09ce7e
> >
> >>> On 3/13/2014 9:13 PM, Gary K9GS wrote:
> >>>> Can anyone point me to a design for a splitter for sharing a Beverage
> >>>> antenna between two receivers?  This is for Field Day so these are not
> >>>> optimized Beverages by any means.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just want to allow the 80/40M stations to share antennas. Nothing 
> >>>> fancy.
> >>>>
> >>>> My thoughts are to just use a CATV "2-Way" splitter at the output of 
> >>>> the
> >>>> Beverage matching transformer and run separate feed-lines to each 
> >>>> radio.
> >>>> I'm pretty sure these things work down to 1 MHz but have not measured
> >>>> them.  I can use the pre-amp in the radio (K3) to compensate for the
> >>>> loss.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2014.0.4336 / Virus Database: 3722/7201 - Release Date: 03/16/14
> > 
> 
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
                                          
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>