On 3/18/2014 11:10 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
You could also use that stuff to feed your TX antenna. I do here. If it's
like the Commscope CATV F-6 coax I have, it'll handle about 3 kW
continuously on 160
Mike,
RG numbers for coax no longer mean much in terms of a specification.
There are dozens of RG-6 cables in the Belden catalog, many very
different from each other, each optimized for different uses. For all
practical purposes, loss doesn't matter for an RX antenna, but shielding
does. Many CATV coax cables have shielding that is optimized for
VHF/UHF, but not so great at MF (160M). Many also have a copper clad
center conductor, which is fine for VHF/UHF, but more loss than copper
at MF, which makes it less wonderful for TX.
Take a look at the shield of any coax that you hope to use on MF and HF.
If it's foil plus a thin braid, it will be lossy at MF/HF, and won't be
a very good shield. If the SWR on the line is low, it may or may not
handle much power. There ARE cables labeled RG6 with a solid copper
center and one or even two dense copper braid shields. Belden makes at
least two, and several years ago, I bought a surplus spool of a similar
cable with Pasternak's name on it, at a good price.
73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|