In this discussion two different ferrite mixes are mentioned: #31 and #61.
>From the descriptions of these on the Fair-Rite web page, it appears that 31
>would be more suitable for lower frequency applications.
Is this the case?
Ron, AE5E
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 4:02 AM, Charlie <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
wrote:
I agree with all those points, Jim! Over the years, professionally, we
designed many Fair-Rite, cores into most of our electricity, gas and water
meter and electricity load-management products and shipped millions of
Fair-Rite products in our devices. Fair-Rite and Kreger are excellent
suppliers, and I still have many of their development kits around here.
Their products are excellent and very consistent
Lynne Frye, of Kreger, is a very helpful contact person, that I have worked
with over the years!
Have a good day!
73,
Charlie Cunningham, K4OTV
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 3:00 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Ferrite Cores
On 8/5/2014 11:36 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
> FT-240-61 cores. Amidon was $9/ea, Mouser (for the Fair Rite
> equivalent)
> >was $14/ea.
The actual manufacturer of a 2.4-in o.d. #61 toroid IS Fair-Rite. It is not
an "equivalent," #61 material is Fair-Rite's mix. Other companies may make a
"knock-off," but the REAL part is made by Fair-Rite.
73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|