Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach"

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach"
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 18:23:58 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Just to note that the low-angle radiation produced by monopoles is not accurately shown by a NEC model/study that does not include the surface wave, regardless of whether one or two ground-plane media are specified in the model.

Below is a link to a NEC study of the low-angle fields of a monopole __including the surface wave__ for three values of earth conductivity ranging from extremely good to very poor.

The curves there all show maximum relative field in the horizontal plane.

If the surface wave had not been included in these studies then all of those fields would have a zero value in the horizontal plane, and reduced fields at low angles just above the horizontal plane.

Reality is that radiation leaving the monopole at elevation angles of at least 5 degrees decays at a 1/r rate. Therefore that radiation is a space wave which propagates in a ~ straight line to reach the ionosphere, where (with suitable conditions) it can return to the earth as a skywave.

NEC analyses of a vertical monopole of 5/8-lambda and less, and not including the fields of the NEC surface wave do not recognize the radiation sector capable of producing the greatest single-hop skywave service range that can be provided by that monopole.

http://s20.postimg.org/9xqgzu9d9/Monopole_Low_Angle_Radiation.jpg

R. Fry
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>