Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Broadband Inverted L

To: "Joe Galicic" <galicic@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Broadband Inverted L
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:45:13 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

I now notice much better receive and transmit performance than before. Before I added the radials the old L was louder in certain directions. That's not the case any more. The new L is louder now regardless of direction. So I'm heading in the right direction. I was able to work 3 new DX entities on 160 including Italy with only 100 watts CW. The DX was about 1-2 S units louder on the new L.

Thanks for all of the helpful suggestions !! It's not easy trying to put up an efficient antenna for 160 on a small lot !


Hi Joe,

Do I understand this correctly? You have both inverted L's up only 40 feet apart, with one of them running directly over a tree??

Unless you are detuning unused antenna, anything you observe is an unknown mix of things. Are you detuning the unused antenna?

How many other things are in the mix?

If it is just one Inverted L, then how are you comparing levels between them? You can't compare levels with only one antenna up at a time.

I don't think it is possible to reach conclusions or offer advice about systems before understanding the entire layout.

73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>