| To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting com | 
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> | 
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:20:29 -0600 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
I meant to say MFJ-1025, not 1026. The 1026 has a built-in sense antenna sticking out of the cover, IIRC. What is really needed --unless the noise is right in your shack-- is a separate antenna that picks up the unwanted noise MUCH better than the one built-in to the 1026. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote: > ... to just get an additional MFJ-1026 to effectively null the second > noise source? > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Fwd: Re: [CQ-Contest] Receive antenna switch, Herbert Schoenbohm | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting com, Herbert Schoenbohm | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - aninteresting com, Tom W8JI | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Looking for 160m narrow beam RX advice - an interesting com, Herbert Schoenbohm | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |