Hi Jim,
I think authorities did their best to allow ON folks all frequencies they
wanted.
The problem,I think, is purely technical. Their low band signals aren't strong
even here in KN29AU.
Just compare them to 9K2HN's on 160 in last contest.
So the problem is engineering - not political.
Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:25:40 -0800 от Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>:
>On Tue,1/20/2015 2:46 PM, David Raymond wrote:
>> Zero copy here in Iowa on 160 for the EP6 op
>
>So far, this group is a non-event out here in 6-land. I've never heard
>them, few others have either, and no one from our DX club has said that
>they worked them. This is starting to smell like another EU trip for EU.
>Or perhaps the authorities have seriously limited what they can do and
>they're making the best of it.
>
>Quite different from other recent expeditions who made very successful
>efforts to make a lot of Qs to the most difficult places.
>
>Last year, N6PSE arranged several skeds with EP3PK on 20 CW. He had a
>very modest station, but a few dozen or more of us managed to work him.
>I was among the lucky ones, and he promptly loaded his log to LOTW.
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>_________________
>Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
--
73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, EO90WF in 2014), P.E.
UARL Technical and VHF Committies
DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mixed, Phone)
DXCC card checker (160 meters).
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|