Just curious, not knowing anymore than I do about RHR....how do they verify
that a paid user even holds a ticket. It would also be alarming to find that
RHR sites are being used to stage DQRM attacks during DXpeditions.
I guess crazier things have been dreamt up....
Cecil
Sent using recycled electrons.
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 6:44 PM, "JC" <n4is@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> "" RHR requires a log in name, password, and they watch IPs. After some
> early abuse, they started checking to be sure the name and password come
> from the same IP or IP pool as the user name and password combo. When it is
> a foreign user, of which there are a limited number, the traffic is
> watched."
>
> Hi Tom
>
> Yes. Everything is so clear and controlled by RHR that no one will use the
> remote station to work a new DXCC because they/he/she must use /p or /W4 ,
> That use of /remote call sign makes the QSO invalid for DXCC.
>
> So, why not published the call sign of all RHR users and send it to DXCC
> desk!
>
> Let's make this clear and transparent.
>
> DXCC can create a new category for RHR DXCC users?
>
> Is this IT9 is a RHR customer?
>
> Regards
> JC
> N4IS
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|