Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: A Bit Off Topic

To: "Bob Garrett" <rgarrett5@comcast.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: A Bit Off Topic
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:34:03 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

Any suggestions appreciated on an effective electrical panel lightning
protection device for my panel breaker box.  Thanks and 73, Bob K3UL


Bob and all,

Keep in mind, spacing between conductors is typically very small compared to conductor length. Although there can be exceptions, virtually all damage is common mode that flows in parallel on bundles between things. (The same is generally true for RFI.)

The vast majority of protection comes from a common entrance ground bond, where everything entering a system, or everything entering an equipment hub, enters through one point where "grounds" are common bonded.

The most prolific damage, and the worse sensitivity to damage, occurs when widely separated things enter without being brought together at one point and bonded.

Broadcast sites go many years taking direct hits without damage without protection devices when they have proper entrance systems, while others are damaged by the weakest of external stimuli when they are improperly wired.

I have very few protection devices. I don't have an entrance panel ground, take dozens of strikes a year, never disconnect anything, and I never have problems. I've never lost a modem, even though the phone lines are above ground for miles. I have had wires outside melt from direct hits without inside equipment damage.

When stations have repetitious or severe damage, it is almost always a poor layout or poor wiring techniques. The best protection devices won't fix that.

73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>