To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: QRP |
From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:09:14 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
>What has happened to the topband conditions the last couple of decades? Two words: Noise and antennas. Noise--yes, millions of cheap junk appliances have destroyed reception. Ever lived next door to a plasma TV? Antennas--Old hams unable to climb or plow in radials and HOAs = crappy antennas. 73 Rob K5UJ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Noise levels on 160, Tree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Noise levels on 160, Tim Shoppa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: QRP, Robert Harmon |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: QRP, James Bennett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |