Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ma160v

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ma160v
From: GALE STEWARD via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Totally agree. It would have to A LOT higher to obtain anything but a cloud 
warming radiation pattern.
Stew K3ND

      From: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
 To: w5jmw@towerfarm.net; topband@contesting.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:58 AM
 Subject: Re: Topband: ma160v
   
Don't waste your time & $$. It's a cloud warmer which is good SS contests &
local QSO parties.
73 N7RT

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
w5jmw@towerfarm.net
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:40 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: ma160v

Hi all.I currently have 1 cushcraft ma160v,as you all know this is a
cushcraft 160 vertical.I just recently aqquired a second.Now,has anyonetried
a rotatable dipole using 2 of these.The idea intrigues me.I could mount this
on a 55 ft tower.The only other antennas are a m2 6 mtr
2 klm's 2 mtr and a 432 m2.So there should not be any interaction.What does
the group think? any ideas? a waste of time? your thoughts..73 john w5jmw

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


   
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>