To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Traditional or off-center fed 160m vertical design? |
From: | Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
Date: | Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:09:42 -0400 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Not having a balanced "T" top section defeats the whole purpose of
reducing the radiation from the top horizontal wire. IMHO the more you
can reduce wasted radiation of the cloud warmer effect the better your
antenna will perform for DX.
Herb, KV4FZ On 11/6/2016 3:16 PM, Robert Fanfant wrote: Based on the modeling I’m leaning towards the off center fed design primarily because It has a lower SWR at resonance (1.83Mhz) than the traditional vertical, and removes the need for building/adding a matching network if I only want to cover the lower portion of the band (CW). Thoughts? _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: RF interference from 160m to GE Electric stove, Gary Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Traditional or off-center fed 160m vertical design?, Clive GM3POI |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Traditional or off-center fed 160m vertical design?, Robert Fanfant |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Traditional or off-center fed 160m vertical design?, Clive GM3POI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |