To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval |
From: | DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:51:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
This is going to be a much bigger issue than the adultered 18M QSLs. :^) I don't know how easy it is to detect the use of a remote RX, unless a P5 contact at 12 noon local time is claimed. :^)) 73 de Vince, VA3VF On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Johann Bruinier <Bruinier@t-online.de> wrote: > > Another unpleasant item is the growing use of remote RXs. It's not > difficult to identify the fakers but does ARRL care? > > Seasons' Greetings & 73! > > Jan DL9KR. > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: ET7L DXCC approval, Johann Bruinier |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval, Chortek, Robert L. |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: ET7L DXCC approval, Johann Bruinier |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Fwd: ET7L DXCC approval, DXer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |