I agree seat time is the only sure way. I have tried a number of
different prop programs
and have not been satisfied so to speak.
What I use now most of the time does not specifically show grey line,
but does do long
and short path, and you can "estimate" grey line by the sunrise /
sunset times shown
and the path predictions to the destination.
It is the old old W6EL prop program.
For me it has been very accurate in predicting openings, simple to use.
Have been able to snag needed countries on the low bands using this
tool, its interesting
to be sitting on the freq and hearing just whispers of the DX, and as
the time plotted
by W6EL approaches the signal comes up out of the noise and you have a
shot at
working them.
Some times the window is very short, but it seems to be pretty accurate
as to time / freq.
It only covers 80 to 10 meters by the way.
73 Merv K9FD/KH6
Hello Kris N5KM,
Thanks for the clarification.
80m is a different story. Yes, we can predict greyline propagation on 80m
(I assume when you say greyline propagation, you mean propagation along the
terminator). And our predictions say there is still significant loss along
and near the terminator on the low bands. Simply put, absorption is
proportional to the product of electron density times electron-neutral
collision frequency - so as we progress from day to night, absorption moves
up from the D region to the lower E region. There is still a prohibitive
amount of absorption along the terminator on the low bands.
What I and others believe is that what really happens is the RF takes a
short cut across the dark ionosphere, where absorption is minimal. The RF
gets far enough away from the terminator to minimize absorption, but not
far enough away to look like it's not greyline. Thus the importance of the
greyline is to put both ends of the path in or near darkness. For a great
article on 80m greyline, read Ed N4II's article in the Nov/Dec QEX titled
"Gray Line Propagation, or Florida to Cocos (Keeling) on 80m". I have
written about the problems with "greyline propagation" numerous times, but
N4II's article is more elegant!
So can we predict this alternate explanation of greyline? Unfortunately, no
- as it involves two great circle paths joined by a skew point. Having said
that, many years ago Rod VE7VV developed a DOS program to address these
skewed paths. I am not familiar enough with it at the moment to offer any
comments. I believe Bill W4ZV has used it more extensively. One comment -
the output of this program appears to be in terms of a monthly median,
since the model of the ionosphere in our prediction programs is a monthly
median model. In other words, VE7VV's predictions say something like a
signal will be so many dB above 0.5 uV on a percentage of days.
Unfortunately, we do not know which will be the good days. Bottom line -
keep you butt in the chair at the appropriate times.
Carl K9LA
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|