That's interesting. Thank you for sharing that with us.
What software are you using, Brian? Joe Taylor's, or some other?
I'm guessing you're only using the wide SSB filter. In any case, I'll have
to try that and see, using CW and SSB filters.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk
> wrote:
>
> I find the better ability for JT65 to decode co-channel signals with its
> two
> pass decoding makes up for any 2dB improvement in decoding JT9. I also find
> a single static crash can take out JT9 decodes, more so than JT65.
>
> > > Why not JT9? It has a 2 dB improvement in S/N ratio on 160, while using
> > > only 1/10 of the bandwidth.
> > >
> > > I cannot understand why JT9 is used so little on 160 thru 20. JT65 is a
> > > VHF mode.
> > >
> > > physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|