Greetings Top Banders,
Well we cant all agree on a 4X transformer primary rule. It depends on what
you want to do with the transformer. In this case a Beverage for 630 meters.
Driving on with the 4X rule will make you think all is well until you decide
one day to add a second Beverage and try to phase them. The phase relationship
between the two different Beverages will be somewhat dependent on the AL of the
transformer cores when using too few turns. AL is not guaranteed or for that
matter very temperature or unit to unit stable. When using transformers for a
single system a few turns will work well providing small signal losses. One
must thoroughly check transformer phasing especially when phasing 8 antennas
together like the Hi-Z 8A receiving antenna. Different cores have different
phase and amplitude responses including toroid and binocular when used in
different circuits such as a Magic Tee & impedance transformation.
So don't be tripped up by a hard and fast rule unless you are using a
transformer in a single antenna use.
I recently ran some VNA plots on the Hi-Z 50 to 75 ohm transformer. I tested 2
of them back to back using the 50 ohm ports of a VNA.
The results were, and remember a single transformer will have 1/2 of the values
below that I measured for 2 back to back transformers.
These transformers are made as an autotransformer where the primary is 4 turns
on a BN73-202 core with another turn added to the 4 for a 4 to 5 turns ratio.
Yes, its 50 to 78.1 ohms as close as you can get with a small number of turns.
Too many turns and you lose high frequency response.
100KHz -1.12 dB at +25.9 degrees phase shift
600KHz -.15 dB at +3.3 degrees phase shift some 4 degrees off values at
160 meters.
1.6 MHz -.22 dB at -0.77 degrees phase shift
7.1 MHz -.29 dB at -9.0 degrees phase shift
Remember single transformers are 1/2 these values.
Single antenna losses only are quite acceptable at 630 meters and 4 turns
primary on a BN73-202 as loss wise one transformer is down less than 1 dB at
100 KHz.
Lee K7TJR OR
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Chuck Hutton
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 5:49 PM
To: kd9sv <kd9sv@comcast.net>; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Beverage transformers tht work down to 630 m
Yes, I think we all agree on the meaning of the 4X rule and the other basics.
The mystery to me remains that a 1 turn transformer was good to 270 kHz in the
Clifton data. I calculate at 500 kHz:
1 turn on a BN73-202 with Al = 8500 gives 9 uH
9 uH is only 28 Ohms
For reference, 2 turns = 34 uH and 107 Ohms. 3 turns is 77 uH and 242 Ohms.
So theory seems to tell me I need 3 turns.
Chuck
Guys, the 4x rule is to my understanding that the measured impedance at the
lowest frequency to be used at should be at least 4 times the operating
impedance. In other words a 50 ohm system would require 200 ohms open circuit
impedance measured at the primary winding of the xfmr. If 2 turns only
measures about 100 ohms then 3 turns would likely be close enough and 4 turns
would also work and would measure 400 ohms which is 8 times the operating
impedance of the antenna system. My test equipment can only measure down to
about 450khz so below that I cannot give an opinion.
73, de gary...ps: the BN202-73 will likely work well with two/6 turns and
3/9 for a 9:1 system for 50 ohms
Thanks for digging that out. It makes me worry much less about using BN73-303's
with 2 or 3 turns in the primary at 630m.
My only problem is that I don't understand why the low end is so good for the 1
turn primary. Using the "4x" rule for the transformer, 4 turns should be needed.
Since I don't understand the response and I don't care about the high end
response, I'm still tempted to use 4 turns and be sure.
Perhaps part of the answer is that reality and theory do not coincide.
According to the published Al, 2.7 turns is need at 500 kHz. to have 64 uH and
satisfy the 4X rule. Yet my 3 turn windings measure 108 uH and 120 uH.
That explains a good bit of the low end response.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 3:50 PM
To: Chuck Hutton
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Beverage transformers tht work down to 630 m
I agree the usual rule of thumb (Transformer winding Z should be several times
larger than nominal line impedance) would cause you to think you should have
more turns.
The old Clifton Labs website is no more. But an archived page of measurements
of transformers shows that the frequency response extends well below what you
might think, from the rule of thumb. Archived page:
https://groups.io/g/BITX20/attachment/27529/0/clifton%20Labs%20IMD%20in%20Br
oadband%20Transformers.pdf
Clifton Laboratories 7236 Clifton Road Clifton VA 20124
...<https://groups.io/g/BITX20/attachment/27529/0/clifton%20Labs%20IMD%20in%
20Broadband%20Transformers.pdf>
groups.io
Clifton Laboratories 7236 Clifton Road Clifton VA 20124 tel: (703) 830 0368
fax: (703) 830 0711 E-mail: Jack.Smith@cliftonlaboratories.com
He finds that BN73-202 transformers wound with a single turn winding, have a
-3dB point at 270kHz.. A two turn winding would be good 4 times as low. So the
rule of thumb seems very conservative.
I have made step-up power converters using these cores and have been super
impressed how well they work at frequencies well below the rule of thumb. I
have run 30+ watts through these dinky cores with them just barely getting warm.
Tim N3QE
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Chuck Hutton
<charlesh3@msn.com<mailto:charlesh3@msn.com>> wrote:
The commercially available Beverage transformers I have seen are like the W8JI
model: 2 primary turns on a BN73-202 core.
My calculations say 4 turns are needed at 630 m.
Does anyone know of commercially available transformers with isolated windings
that operates well down to 630m?
Chuck
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|